Certain politically motivated lobbies are propagating unwarranted perceptions and concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear security regime. The narrative and myth are based on unproven assertions that ignore the realities on the ground and are more likely propaganda oriented. The fact is that Pakistan is a responsible nuclear power state and is firmly devoted to the goal of nuclear safety and security. It has been vigorously engaged with the international community to make it aware of nuclear safety and security mechanisms. Pakistan’s nuclear regime is grounded in the national legislative, regulatory and administrative framework. The components of nuclear security in Pakistan include a robust nuclear command and control system. It established the National Command Authority (NCA) to strengthen nuclear security in 2001. It also focuses on a rigorous regulatory regime, comprehensive export controls, and international cooperation.

A national nuclear security regime needs a well-organized legal framework and rules for administering nuclear materials. It also requires a unified system and measures, including intelligence, prevention, detection, and response. In particular, the human factor cannot be omitted from the debate on nuclear security, making it necessary to have reliable leadership and personnel working on security matters of the state.

Against this backdrop, Pakistan’s nuclear security regime is constantly evaluated and revised to harmonize with international standards. Pakistan has already established a robust command and control system at its state level by establishing autonomous regulatory bodies. These include the National Command Authority (NCA), Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), and the Export Control Regime. NCA is the main controlling body for all nuclear matters, including nuclear security and strategic activities. The Strategic Plan Division (SPD), the secretariat of NCA, regularly supervises the nuclear security mechanism. Pakistan’s Center of Excellence on Nuclear Security (PCENS) is always engaged in exercises and training of its personnel regarding the state’s nuclear security. Moreover, Pakistan has been working with the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT).  Pakistan has submitted six reports to the UNSC 1540 Committee, which elucidate the measures taken by Pakistan to ensure nuclear and radiological security and to control and monitor the transfer of sensitive materials and technologies.

Pakistan, with the help of these institutions, performs various tasks to ensure nuclear security at the state level, such as the preparation of security policy, protection of sensitive information and facilities, the establishment of the legal framework, distribution and coordination of responsibility, and a proper mechanism for coordination.  According to the IAEA, organizational levels of nuclear security responsibilities include “nuclear security policy, management structure (i.e., defined roles and responsibilities, resources (i.e., financial, technical and human), management system, review, and improvement”. In this context, the institutions established by Pakistan, as mentioned earlier, plays a significant role in ensuring nuclear security at the managerial and individual levels of security.

In view of Pakistan’s nuclear security culture, the perception and concerns of the international community are mere myths that must be dismissed, and a realistic depiction should be brought. For instance,  the recent statement by US President Joe Biden on  Pakistan’s nuclear security,  “nuclear weapons without any cohesion,” and the Indian narrative, as well as the Indian fabricated propaganda that ‘Pakistan’s nuclear weapons may be taken over by terrorists or radicals’ are evidence of these erroneous perceptions.

In this context, both Western and Indian-led officials and analysts need to look at the nuclear security incidents that have repeatedly been occurring in India in the recent past. For instance, Indian authorities have seized an enormous volume of uranium. On June 4. 2021, 6.4kg of uranium was in Jharkhand; on May 7, 2021, 7kg of uranium was in Maharashtra; on August 26, 2021, 250 kg of Californium in Kolkata was confiscated. Other examples include the lapses in the Indian conventional security mechanism.  The BrahMos missile incident of March 2022 breached Pakistan’s territorial integrity and threatened its sovereignty. This could have led to severe repercussions, but Pakistan played a decisive role and reacted sensibly.

 Pakistan’s top leadership, therefore, rejected the statements and condemned the false narratives. Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr. Shahbaz Sharif, rejected the recent statement issued by US President Joe Bidens on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons as ‘factually incorrect and misleading. He further added by tweeting, ‘Let me reiterate unequivocally: Pakistan is a responsible nuclear state, and we are proud that our nuclear assets have the best safeguards as per IAEA requirements. We take these safety measures with the utmost seriousness. Let no one have any doubts.

Given the delicacy and impact of the comments, as well as a prompt response from Pakistani authorities, Vedant Patel, spokesman for US State Department, has rejected the assumptions and said that ‘US is confident of Pakistan’s commitment and its ability to secure nuclear assets’.

Biden’s comments have also been linked with the political instability in Pakistan. However, political issues do not affect nuclear security. The concerned authorities have already dismissed the narrative, such as the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (JCSC) General Nadeem Raza, during a keynote address back in June 2022 at a seminar on “Regional Environment and Imperatives of Security” at the NUST Institute of Policy Studies (NIPS), said that ‘unnecessary and unfounded views on Pakistan’s nuclear programme should be avoided, adding that Pakistan is a responsible nuclear power’. He also asserted that ‘Pakistan is a confident and responsible nuclear power. It pursues the policy of full-spectrum deterrence with the precincts of credible minimum deterrence. Our national security and safety architecture meets all national and international obligations and caters for all kinds of scenarios’.

In conclusion, the international community instead of being indifferent towards other countries, does not need to ignore the weak nuclear security mechanisms and nuclear issues of a certain states that requires urgent attention. On the other hand, Pakistan has taken systematic measures to advance its nuclear security. It has taken every possible step to demonstrate that it is a responsible nuclear weapon state with a well-established and institutionalized export control regime and a solid track record in nuclear safety and security. However, unwarranted statements create misperceptions leading to trust deficit and an unstable strategic environment. Pakistan supports a stable and trusted relationship with the US based on mutual interest.

This article has been published in another form at https://nationalinterest.org/feature/pakistan-responsible-nuclear-power-205986

Share.

Comments are closed.

Mr Syed Ali Abbas

Research Officer/ Comm Officer/ Managing Editor CISS Insight

Syed Ali Abbas is a Research Officer/Communication Officer at the Center for International Strategic Studies (CISS), Islamabad. Previously, he served as an associate editor at Indus News Network. His areas of interest include Middle East politics, military modernization, foreign policy, and nuclear politics. He has contributed to various platforms, including The National Interest, South Asian Voices, and others.

Dr Anum Riaz

Associate Director Research

Dr. Anum Riaz is the Associate Director Research at the Center for International Strategic Studies, Islamabad. She holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the Department of Political Science at Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. She also possesses M.Phil. and M.Sc. degrees from the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. Additionally, she has taught BS and Master’s students at the Department of Political Science at Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. Her areas of interest include strategic studies, international relations, international nuclear politics, the nuclear non-proliferation regime, arms control and disarmament, as well as traditional and non-traditional security issues.

Dr Bilal Zubair

Director Research

Dr. Bilal Zubair has worked as an Assistant Professor at the National Defence University Islamabad and Lecturer at the National University of Science and Technology. He holds a Ph.D. and M. Phil. in International Relations from Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad. Dr. Zubair is author of the book Chinese Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in the United States (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and contributed to several journal articles and book chapters focusing on soft power, diplomacy, and China’s role in international relations.

His research has been published in various academic journals, and he has presented at international conferences Dr. Zubair has also been an active reviewer and editorial board member. His professional interests include great power politics, and the role of communication in global diplomacy.

Mr Mobeen Jafar Mir

Research Officer

Mobeen Jafar Mir is a Research Officer at the Center for International Strategic Studies (CISS), Islamabad. His research focuses on U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the areas of strategy, technology, and arms control. He is currently pursuing an M.Phil. in International Relations at the School of Politics and International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. He can be found on Twitter @jafar_mobeen.

Exit mobile version